A Window on your World

BLUE Information Center

What is

/ Surveys

Try a Blue/Surveys Demo

Technical Requirements

Check out the FAQs
Request More Information
Download the Blue Brochure
Blue/Surveys Features List

"Gathering information is only half the battle. Information must be placed in context to have meaning. Blue’s power comes from the ability to blend data from external sources with the gathered information. Results can be broken down by multiple factors contained either in the questionnaire or an external source such as an HRMS system. For example a report breaking down job satisfaction by gender, tenure, department and geography is easily generated by the results of a survey that only asked questions related to job satisfaction."

Blue/Surveys Operational Improvements
Moving surveys to the web will dramatically reduce costs and implementation time while significantly improving response rates.The response rate for an employee satisfaction survey accomplished on the web is, typically, about 80%, compared to 50% to 60% for paper surveys: Web surveys are easier to fill out; they may be completed at the respondents’ convenience; web surveys assist the respondents with the question and answer options; As well, they may transmit automatic reminder notices via e-mail; an easy, and inexpensive way to ensure that respondents remember to fill out the questionnaire.

Data Integrity - Web surveys eliminate the potential of incorrect results. Responses are controlled and validated on the fly. Responses are directly posted to the database eliminating the need for data entry clerks who may make typing errors while entering results.

Results and Analysis - With web surveys, data is automatically collected in one centralized location, and can be analyzed and charted in real time while the survey is still in process. Storing the results automatically in a centralized data warehouse, and providing accurate results and analysis to the survey originator does not require any technical knowledge. This provides added freedom for the survey originators, who can now simply focus on analyzing the results, instead of being concerned about the means of analyzing the results.

Implementation Cost and Effort - Paper surveys need to be distributed to the employee or customer. Once completed, their results need to be keyed in by contractors or dedicated employees; this part still requires some level of technological knowledge in order to manage the data. The process of distributing tens of thousands of surveys, following up on them, keying in and analyzing the results requires a large investment in personnel.

Frequency - The traditional annual survey results in “all the eggs in one basket.” Everything depends on how employees are doing on the day of the survey. The survey process tends to focus on getting a high response rate. However, how much is their mood is affecting responses? Are they being honest? Do they trust their employers?

With more frequent assessment, enterprises gather better data because they can analyze trends, and not point-in-time data. For example, if we project this notion to the use of financial data. An enterprise’s executive team cannot make sense by only looking at net profit, sales, or cash flow once a year. They use financial data for decision making purposes, hence they collect it frequently.

Targeting - Targeting is also critical in ensuring the quality of survey results. If an enterprise wants to know what its employees think, they need to ask all of them. There is one main difference between using a survey, and basing major decisions on what a focus group or a couple of people have to say: That difference is getting honest answers. If a survey is done properly, it gives some anonymity to the respondents, so they are positioned to answer as honestly as possible.